home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- CINEMA, Page 82Taking Flak
-
-
- Is Air America bad history?
-
-
- Talk about negative reviews. First Air America, the Mel
- Gibson-goes-gonzo-in-Indochina summer spectacular, was
- generally panned by the critics. Then last week it was even
- more savagely attacked by journalists and authors in the New
- York Times and the Wall Street Journal. At issue was the real
- Air America, the CIA-run airline that ferried arms and supplies
- to anti-communist forces in Indochina during the Vietnam War.
- As flippantly depicted in the movie, the airline serves as a
- front for heroin smuggling condoned by the CIA in order to fund
- the U.S.'s secret war in Laos. This version, the articles point
- out, does violence not only to the many props that are blown
- up, but also to the real-life pilots of Air America and to the
- historical record.
-
- The Times piece, written by Christopher Robbins, author of
- the book on which the movie was based, noted that "the CIA did
- not lack funds for its war in Laos, and the U.S. embassy in
- Vientiane went to considerable lengths to control and curtail
- the [drug] trade." In the Journal, publisher Peter Kann, who
- was a reporter in Vietnam, and Phillip Jennings, a former Air
- America pilot, called the movie a "political obscenity" that
- smears Air America pilots as buffoons. "This drivel is scripted
- with all the subtlety of an Animal House cast reciting passages
- from Jane Fonda's Hanoi diaries."
-
- Air America screenwriter John Eskow counters that Robbins
- is "morally despicable," having lost a bid to be credited as
- co-author of the screenplay. Says Eskow: "The book wasn't
- interesting enough to serve as the movie's sole springboard.
- I had to do other research. I spoke to Air America pilots here
- and went to Thailand." Besides, he argues, a screenplay "is a
- creative act. It is not a documentary, and it doesn't advertise
- itself that way."
-
- For better or worse, however, movies help shape our view of
- history; those that distort sensitive issues, as this one does,
- do a disservice that cannot be justified by calling it
- creative. There is a difference between artistic license and
- simply license.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-